Letter to Sheriffs of Colorado’s District Three

Below is an example of the letters that were personalized and sent out to the sheriffs in Colorado’s District Three.  Please feel free to use this verbiage however you may like to write to the sheriffs in your county and state.

Sheriff Dave Strong

1315 17th Street

Alamosa, Colorado  81101

 

Sheriff Strong,

I am running for congress in Colorado’s third congressional district.  I am running because I am very concerned about our country’s economy and the numerous unconstitutional laws coming out of Washington.

I know that the Sheriff is the highest executive authority in the county – and that the sheriff has the authority and responsibility to protect the citizens in their county from unconstitutional actions by the federal government.  The passage of the National Defense Authorization Act (NDAA) and Strategic Implementation Plan for Empowering Local Partners to Prevent Violent Extremism in the United States (SIP), demonstrate how severe the problem has become, and show how imperative it is that solutions must be enacted at the local level.

Peggy Littleton, the county commissioner of El Paso County, recently presented a resolution to “keep the federal government from overstepping its authority when enforcing terrorism law – specifically as it relates to habeas corpus, the right to due process under the law” (KRDO News, December 15, 2011).

Arizona’s Sheriff Richard Mack has spoken and written about the importance of our county sheriffs in his book, County Sheriff – America’s Last Hope.  I will be sending you a copy for your reference and review.

Sheriff Mack is also organizing the first annual County Sheriff Project scheduled for January 30th in Las Vegas, Nevada.  Two hundred Sheriffs from across the country will gather to increase their understanding and awareness of the true power of their constitutional authority and to unite in a concerted effort to uphold and defend the United States Constitution.

Sponsors are currently raising money to cover the travel and lodging expenses at no cost to the Sheriffs who are invited.  I have reason to believe that you will be one of the county Sheriffs who will be receiving an eMail invitation directly from Sheriff Mack. I am hoping that you will consider attending this historic event if you are given that opportunity.

I am a young woman who believes in the principles embodied in the Constitution.  I am not a terrorist or an extremist.  I am an activist and a true believer in liberty.  I want to know that you will protect us by throwing out federal agents that attempt to harm us in our peaceful protests and constitutional expressions of our first amendment rights.

I have written about the importance for local communities to rely on county Sheriffs on our campaign website, www.Casida2012.com.  I would like to request a meeting with you when we are in town touring the district.  Please contact me at any time. I would like to work with you to create a positive and actionable dialogue that will protect our communities and country.

In Liberty,

Tisha T. Casida

INDEPENDENCE – Kill the Republican Party (and Democratic Party) Elitist Machines

Now, more than any election cycle in the last 40 years, people are switching their voter registration to Independent.  Not because they will vote for Independents but because they are embarrassed to be Republican or Democrat.  So, that’s the first step – to shame people into opting out of parties.  Both parties are doing a great job of pushing away the people they need to win and can’t understand why (and never will).   So, “infiltration of a party” is very temporary.  Parties, by nature, become corrupted.  Republican elites want to discredit Ron Paul, Newt Gingrich, Herman Cain, Rick Perry, Michele Bachman or anyone else that they don’t want to hand-feed us.  I understand that the ‘frat-club’ mentality and process exists to sort-out candidates to declare an overall candidate that the party supports.  But when it becomes so obvious that the people who caucus are being pushed around and manipulated rather than making sound decisions on their own the process – the people who seek truth will revolt.

 

We will see if Iowa remains relevant and then follow each state after to see if any of them are relevant, or find out if it’s just a big joke stacked with primary puppets in each state.  For the media and Republican Class Elites, wining Iowa is only relevant if you pick who they want.  Even the debates started off stacked.  Where did Gary Johnson and John Huntsman go?  Both are very successful Governors and were barely allowed to participate in debates because they didn’t meet the polling criteria.  How is that possible when their names were not even included in most of the polling?  Yet Santorum (who polls lower than both Huntsman and Johnson) is still included in debates?  Suspect behavior by the media and Republicans for sure.  Does anyone remember way back when Gary Johnson tied third with Chris Christie at CPAC?  And then that was promptly ignored and excluded from just about all things Republican?  Do we see any relation to this in Iowa?  Maybe the same people in control?  These two fine candidates were not given a fair shake because they were a threat to the GOP and Republican Elites knew to kill them off early in their process.

 

So, here we go again with the ‘Flavor of the Week’ scenario in Iowa.  Really?  It’s so obvious the Republican Political Elite-Class Machine is in full swing when the only candidate that keeps floating is the Mitt Cookie they are trying to feed us.  Mitt just keeps floating about halfway up the glass and never to the top.  Why?  Every candidate that begins to rise somehow has something pop up that beats them back down just below the unimpressive Mitt percent of reliable level pullers.  Most of the ‘scandals’ are from decades past that someone had to dig deep for and then had to twist and feed to the media in ways to support an attack.  It’s working because big media continues to control what you see and hear via the Republican Elite Machine.  Why do we continue to enable the press and the Elite Political Class, are we the chumps they think we are?  Its looking like we have another poor choice coming our way just like McCain was force-fed to us because, according to the Republican Machine, only McCain could win against Obama and now only Romney.  Really?  How blind can Republicans be?

 

We have the opportunity to capture the White House, Senate and House with candidates who will make the radial changes needed to restore liberty to the American People only if people realize that Independent voters determine who wins elections and that the media and both parties restrict our vision when we let them.  We live in a time when the Internet and other communications provide huge amounts of information to look at and consider.  It’s all slanted but the real problem is what each person considers ‘reliable’.  I am asking people to look beyond their reliable sources and open their minds.  There is no perfect candidate.  There are, however, many great choices beyond what the parties shove in your face and then warn us that a vote for anyone else is really a loss.  So, if you felt that your vote for McCain last time was a smart move, you are obviously part of the problem.  And if you think Obama is going keep the Independents that voted him in last time, you’d be wrong on that one also.  Both parties have demonstrated that a win for either Republican or Democrat is the best thing for the elites on both sides – which is all about control and power, and enslaving the American People.  Wake up – THEY ARE NOT ON OUR SIDE!  The side of Freedom, Prosperity, and Peace!

 

Voting your conscience might actually change things for the better.  Regardless, a vote for Romney is a vote for Obama because they are one in the same.  Open your mind, and the truth shall set you free.

STRATEGIC IMPLEMENTATION PLAN FOR EMPOWERING LOCAL PARTNERS TO PREVENT VIOLENT EXTREMISM IN THE UNITED STATES

What defines an extremist?  What defines extremism?

“As a government, we are working to prevent all types of extremism that leads to violence, regardless of who inspires it. At the same time, countering al-Qa’ida’s violent ideology is onepart of our comprehensive strategy to defeat al-Qa’ida. Over the past 2½ years, more key al-Qa’ida leaders—including Usama bin Laden—have been eliminated in rapid succession than at any time since the September 11 attacks. We have strengthened homeland security and improved information sharing. Thanks to coordinated intelligence and law enforcement, numerous terrorist plots have been thwarted, saving many American lives.” —President Barack Obama, August 2011

How is it possible to prevent extremism that leads to violence – regardless of who inspires it?  What must be done?  How do you know who to stop and when?  This most recent Strategic Implementation Plan (SIP) out of Washington, D.C. leaves those definitions pretty open.

This is about definitions and who is defining them.  Most of us would agree that “extremists” who go and kill others (including themselves) are dangerous.  What about people who are extreme in their rhetoric but would never hurt anyone?  Freedom of speech allows us to speak up and out as long as we are not violating anyone else’s right to life and liberty. What if those people who speak up are called an extremist?  Are the Occupy Wall Street crowds engaging in extremism?  Are the Tea Party crowds engaging in extremism?  Are Ron Paul followers and supporters engaging in extremism?  Isn’t it up to the person to decide whether or not these people will engage in violence?  Before a crime is committed – who has the power to actually know what people are going to do?  Law enforcement and our government are not God and do not know everything.  Why are they the ones to decide who is being extreme and whether or not those people may use violence BEFORE IT HAS EVEN HAPPENED?  Isn’t that dangerous to our freedom to express ourselves?

I take offense to this and these definition because I myself have been called a “radical” and an “extremist” because I really truly believe in the Constitution of the United States being the control mechanism to keep our government in check.  I have also been called these names because I have given up everything to be able to try and speak to others about it.  I have even been called this when I say that I believe in Jesus Christ, as he walked and taught us while on this earth.  And if someone tried to kill me for any of these things, I would fight back.  Does that fit their definition of extremism?  Am I now the enemy?

These are questions you should ask yourself.  Even if YOU don’t think you are doing anything – what if someone who didn’t like you decided that you are?  What if they then tell local law enforcement what a dangerous and extreme person you are?  Are you now the enemy?

Just reminding you that we have more freedom right now than we may ever have again, and you better use it.

HERE IS THE DOCUMENT – IT IS EASY TO READ THROUGH, PLEASE DO

“Guard against the impostures of pretended patriotism.”
– George Washington

CREATIVE DESIGN FROM BROOKLYN

Big or small, we’ve got a solution when you need it. Our advanced service and support tools provide step-by-stepinstructions without being put on hold or waiting in line.